Height vs BMI: ten destinations and the USA

A two-axis comparison of women’s mean height and mean BMI. Bubble area is implied weight; the USA is the baseline.

Scatter plot of women’s mean height and BMI across ten destinations and the USA, with bubble area indicating implied weight

Height runs left to right, BMI bottom to top, and bubble area is implied weight. The inputs are country means, not measurements of individuals.

Download the chart (PNG)

What the chart says

  1. BMI and height are different variables, so neither should stand in for the other. The two-axis view avoids the false precision of a single ranking.
  2. The bubbles are a derived illustration. They are based on the published BMI and height means, not on a measured country-weight series.

All 11

The full set shown in the image, ordered by mean female BMI.

#MarketAdults overweight, both sexesWomen’s heightWomen’s BMI, 20–39Women’s implied weight
1Japan24.4%158.5 cm21.052.8 kg
2Vietnam20.0%158.4 cm21.654.1 kg
3South Korea36.7%163.2 cm22.259.1 kg
4Philippines37.3%154.1 cm23.355.3 kg
5Kenya32.1%159.4 cm24.061.1 kg
6Thailand47.2%159.4 cm24.562.4 kg
7Ukraine56.2%166.6 cm25.269.9 kg
8Colombia61.1%158.0 cm25.463.3 kg
9Brazil65.0%162.4 cm25.767.9 kg
10Mexico74.2%157.9 cm27.368.2 kg
11USA71.4%163.3 cm27.773.9 kg

Height is women at age 19 (2019); BMI is women 20–39 (2016). Bubble area and implied-weight column are derived, not measured.

Where this is wrong

Sources

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), BMI 2016 and height 2019 releases.

For decisions that are city-specific, use the research desk.

More charts

Move from country averages to city-level data →

Sort actual locations by the factors that change from city to city: ratio, cost and safety.

The per-market deep-dives — 13 tabs of cost, visa, tax, safety and sub-national ratio for one country — are behind the Pro gate. Everything on this page is not.