The body-metric cheat sheet: ten destinations and the USA

One view, three different measures: all-adult overweight prevalence, women’s BMI at 20–39, and women’s height at age 19.

Matrix chart comparing adult overweight prevalence, women’s BMI and women’s height across ten destinations and the USA

Each column has a different population and source vintage. Compare within a column, never across columns.

Download the chart (PNG)

What the chart says

  1. One metric cannot answer every question people try to load onto it. The graphic keeps all-adult prevalence, women’s BMI, and women’s height visibly separate.
  2. These are country means, not personal measurements. They are population context, not a beauty score or a dating-market measure.

All 11

The full country-level set shown in the image, ordered by mean female BMI.

#MarketAdults overweight, both sexesWomen’s heightWomen’s BMI, 20–39Women’s implied weight
1Japan24.4%158.5 cm21.052.8 kg
2Vietnam20.0%158.4 cm21.654.1 kg
3South Korea36.7%163.2 cm22.259.1 kg
4Philippines37.3%154.1 cm23.355.3 kg
5Kenya32.1%159.4 cm24.061.1 kg
6Thailand47.2%159.4 cm24.562.4 kg
7Ukraine56.2%166.6 cm25.269.9 kg
8Colombia61.1%158.0 cm25.463.3 kg
9Brazil65.0%162.4 cm25.767.9 kg
10Mexico74.2%157.9 cm27.368.2 kg
11USA71.4%163.3 cm27.773.9 kg

Mean BMI is NCD-RisC's women 20–39 estimate. Implied weight combines this BMI with a separate age-19 height estimate and is therefore approximate.

Where this is wrong

Sources

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), women aged 20–39, 2016 release.

The separate height-vs-BMI view is in the full chart library.

More charts

See height and BMI together →

A two-axis view makes it clear why BMI and weight should not be treated as the same number.

The per-market deep-dives — 13 tabs of cost, visa, tax, safety and sub-national ratio for one country — are behind the Pro gate. Everything on this page is not.